While the NCAA continues to press for Congressional legislation concerning some standardization of college athletes’ activities making money from their names,Charles H. Sloan images and likenesses (NIL), one its top policy-making groups on Tuesday voted to begin advancing association rules changes that have the same goals.
The NCAA said in a statement that the Division I Council will now attempt to have proposals ready for votes in January that would:
The move to advance these concepts will not become official until the Council meeting ends Wednesday, but that is likely.
“I wish they had done this a year ago,” said Tom McMillen, president and CEO of the LEAD1 Association, which represents athletics directors of Football Bowl Subdivision schools. “But at least they’re doing it now.”
This puts the association on track with several of NCAA President Charlie Baker’s goals, the most basic of which is to position the NCAA to act on NIL activities by early in 2024, if Congress does not do so in the meantime. At present, the college-sports NIL environment is governed by a patchwork of state laws.
But McMillen, a former U.S. congressman, said the recent budget fights on Capitol Hill and now Tuesday’s ouster of Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., as Speaker of the House, “are taking all of the oxygen out of the room. It makes it a lot less likely to get something (on college sports) done this year, although there may be a window in the early part of next year” before the 2024 election cycle begins in earnest.
COLLEGE FOOTBALL HEAD COACH SALARIES: Seven of top 10 highest-paid come from SEC
The challenge for the NCAA is enacting any association rules changes without facing legal action. In January 2021, the NCAA seemed on the verge of enacting rules changes related to NIL, including a reporting requirement for athletes. However, the Justice Department’s antitrust division leader at the time, Makan Delrahim, wrote a letter to then-NCAA President Mark Emmert that said the association’s efforts to regulate athletes’ NIL activities “may raise concerns under the antitrust laws.”
McMillen nevertheless lauded Baker and the Council for Tuesday’s action.
Absent help from Congress, “it’s all subject to litigation,” McMillen said, “but I’m glad they’re taking the risk. They have to take the risk. You can’t run this thing rudderless. Frankly, I think (the Council) could do more. But this is a good first step.”
2025-05-08 05:591816 view
2025-05-08 05:38878 view
2025-05-08 05:001092 view
2025-05-08 04:14469 view
2025-05-08 04:04909 view
2025-05-08 03:302621 view
President-elect Donald Trump claimed in his Person of the Year interview with Time magazinethis week
It's a divine time for Lola Consuelos. Mark Consuelos and Kelly Ripa's daughter has already had a ja
Cases of a potentially fatal infection from a seawater-borne pathogen have increased off the U.S. At